COUNTY ROAD J over LAKE MEREDITH INLET CNL
Map
Coordinates:
+38.24390, -103.6776938°14'38" N, 103°40'40" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | COUNTY ROAD J over LAKE MEREDITH INLET CNL |
Structure number: | CRCO 4.00-29A |
Location: | 1.0 MI WEST OF CR 22 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 24.9 ft. [7.6 m] |
Total length: | 28.9 ft. [8.8 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 27.9 ft. [8.5 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 30.2 ft. [9.2 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1999 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6] |
Main span material: | Steel [3] |
Main span design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Gravel [8] |
Latest Available Inspection: January 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 27 [as of 2013] |
Deck condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 97.0 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
January 2017 | Good | Very Good | Good | Very Good | 27 | 97.0 |
January 2015 | Good | Very Good | Good | Very Good | 27 | 97.0 |
January 2013 | Good | Very Good | Good | Very Good | 15 | 97.0 |
January 2011 | Good | Very Good | Good | Very Good | 15 | 97.0 |
January 2009 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 28 | 97.0 |
December 2006 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 28 | 97.0 |
October 2004 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 28 | 97.0 |
February 2003 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 28 | 97.0 |
March 2001 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 28 | 97.0 |
May 2000 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 20 | 97.0 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Steel Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 203 | 103 | 100 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 203 | 0 | 203 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 879 | 879 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 61 | 61 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 58 | 0 | 58 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 58 | 0 | 58 | 0 | 0 |