US 24 ML over DRAW
Map
Coordinates:
+38.94632, -105.2875238°56'47" N, 105°17'15" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | US 24 ML over DRAW |
Structure number: | I-15-Z |
Location: | IN FLORISSANT |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Minor Arterial (Rural) [06] |
Length of largest span: | 23.0 ft. [7.0 m] |
Total length: | 70.5 ft. [21.5 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 28.9 ft. [8.8 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 29.9 ft. [9.1 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1936 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Wood or timber [7] |
Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Wood or Timber [8] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: September 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 5,500 [as of 2011] |
Truck traffic: | 6% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 65.5 |
Recommended work: | Widening of existing bridge or other major structure without deck rehabilitation or replacement [33] |
Estimated cost of work: | $362,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
September 2018 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 5500 | 65.5 |
September 2016 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 5500 | 65.5 |
September 2014 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 5500 | 65.5 |
September 2012 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 5000 | 67.6 |
September 2010 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 5000 | 67.6 |
September 2008 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 5000 | 67.6 |
August 2006 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 5700 | 65.5 |
September 2004 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 5576 | 64.2 |
November 2002 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 5054 | 63.9 |
July 2000 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 4932 | 69.2 |
July 1998 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 4932 | 69.2 |
August 1996 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 3550 | 69.4 |
July 1994 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 3350 | 72.1 |
August 1991 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 2800 | 70.2 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Timber Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 966 | 897 | 69 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Timber Column | each | 26 | 4 | 22 | 0 | 0 |
Timber Abutment | linear ft. | 60 | 52 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
Timber Pier Cap | linear ft. | 136 | 136 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Timber Deck | sq. ft. | 2,112 | 0 | 2,112 | 0 | 0 |
Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 2,042 | 1,429 | 0 | 613 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Timber Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 142 | 92 | 50 | 0 | 0 |