SH 120 ML over RR, ARKANSAS RIVER
This bridge is no longer in the current National Bridge Inventory database, and has likely been demolished or abandoned.
Map
Coordinates:
+38.38722, -105.0150038°23'14" N, 105°00'54" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | SH 120 ML over RR, ARKANSAS RIVER |
Structure number: | K-16-K |
Location: | 0.3 MI E OF PORTLAND |
Purpose: | Carries highway over railroad and waterway |
Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
Length of largest span: | 150.6 ft. [45.9 m] |
Total length: | 388.1 ft. [118.3 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 12.1 ft. [3.7 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 23.6 ft. [7.2 m] |
Vertical clearance below bridge: | 22.3 ft. [6.8 m] |
Skew angle: | 99° |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1927 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is on the National Register of Historic Places [1] |
Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
Main span material: | Steel [3] |
Main span design: | Truss - Deck [09] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: August 2012
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, temporary structure in place to carry legal loads [E] |
Average daily traffic: | 220 [as of 2008] |
Truck traffic: | 13% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Underclearances appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 13.5 |
Recommended work: | Widening of existing bridge or other major structure without deck rehabilitation or replacement [33] |
Estimated cost of work: | $493,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
August 2012 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 220 | 13.5 |
September 2010 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 220 | 13.5 |
September 2008 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 220 | 20.4 |
August 2007 | Poor | Satisfactory | Serious | Fair | 300 | 18.1 |
August 2006 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 300 | 50.5 |
July 2004 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 400 | 50.5 |
July 2002 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 186 | 52.1 |
July 2000 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 180 | 51.8 |
August 1998 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 180 | 51.8 |
August 1996 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 190 | 51.8 |
September 1994 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 240 | 50.2 |
August 1992 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 240 | 48.2 |
August 1990 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 200 | 48.3 |