Share:

County Road 13E over Love/Horse Shoe Canal

Map

Coordinates:
+40.43378, -105.06797
40°26'02" N, 105°04'05" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:County Road 13E over Love/Horse Shoe Canal
Structure number:LR13E-0.3-24E
Location:0.3 Mi N of Co Rd 24E
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Collector (Urban) [17]
Length of largest span:8.9 ft. [2.7 m]
Total length:21.7 ft. [6.6 m]
Roadway width between curbs:25.3 ft. [7.7 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:27.2 ft. [8.3 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1937
Historic significance:Bridge is possibly eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [3]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Masonry [8]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]

Latest Available Inspection: March 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:6,271 [as of 2012]
Truck traffic:4% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Culvert condition:Moderate to major deterioration or disintegration, extensive cracking and leaching or spalls on concrete or masonry walls and slabs. Minor settlement or misalignment. Noticeable scouring or erosion at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have significant distortion and deflection in one section, significant corrosion or deep pitting. [5]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour conditions; field review indicates action is required. [4]
Sufficiency rating:66.1
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$125,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionCulvert ConditionADTSuff. Rating
March 2017Fair5 out of 10627166.1
March 2015Fair5 out of 10627166.1
March 2013Fair5 out of 10627166.1
August 2011Fair5 out of 10604766.1
February 2009Fair5 out of 10604766.1
June 2007Fair6 out of 10773996.3
March 2005Fair6 out of 10773977.1
March 2003Fair6 out of 10773977.1
April 2002Fair6 out of 10558677.7
August 2000Fair5 out of 10558666.2
September 1999Fair6 out of 10558677.3
September 1998Fair6 out of 10558677.3
October 1996Fair6 out of 10269380.2
April 1994Fair6 out of 10269380.0
November 1992Fair6 out of 10269379.6
April 1990Good7 out of 10231675.9

Element Data

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
ElementUnitsQuantity1-Good2-Fair3-Poor4-Serious
Culvert
Masonry Culvertlinear ft.5401530
Bridge Rail
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Raillinear ft.4444000
Steel Protective Coatingsq. ft.4444000