County Road 13E over Love/Horse Shoe Canal
Map
Coordinates:
+40.43378, -105.0679740°26'02" N, 105°04'05" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | County Road 13E over Love/Horse Shoe Canal |
Structure number: | LR13E-0.3-24E |
Location: | 0.3 Mi N of Co Rd 24E |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Collector (Urban) [17] |
Length of largest span: | 8.9 ft. [2.7 m] |
Total length: | 21.7 ft. [6.6 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 25.3 ft. [7.7 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 27.2 ft. [8.3 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1937 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is possibly eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [3] |
Number of main spans: | 2 |
Main spans material: | Masonry [8] |
Main spans design: | Culvert [19] |
Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
Latest Available Inspection: March 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 6,271 [as of 2012] |
Truck traffic: | 4% of total traffic |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Culvert condition: | Moderate to major deterioration or disintegration, extensive cracking and leaching or spalls on concrete or masonry walls and slabs. Minor settlement or misalignment. Noticeable scouring or erosion at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have significant distortion and deflection in one section, significant corrosion or deep pitting. [5] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour conditions; field review indicates action is required. [4] |
Sufficiency rating: | 66.1 |
Recommended work: | Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34] |
Estimated cost of work: | $125,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Culvert Condition | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
March 2017 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 6271 | 66.1 |
March 2015 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 6271 | 66.1 |
March 2013 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 6271 | 66.1 |
August 2011 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 6047 | 66.1 |
February 2009 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 6047 | 66.1 |
June 2007 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 7739 | 96.3 |
March 2005 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 7739 | 77.1 |
March 2003 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 7739 | 77.1 |
April 2002 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 5586 | 77.7 |
August 2000 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 5586 | 66.2 |
September 1999 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 5586 | 77.3 |
September 1998 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 5586 | 77.3 |
October 1996 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 2693 | 80.2 |
April 1994 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 2693 | 80.0 |
November 1992 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 2693 | 79.6 |
April 1990 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 2316 | 75.9 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Culvert |
Masonry Culvert | linear ft. | 54 | 0 | 1 | 53 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 44 | 44 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 44 | 44 | 0 | 0 | 0 |