COUNTY ROAD 3W over RIO GRANDE RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+37.62419, -106.2042337°37'27" N, 106°12'15" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | COUNTY ROAD 3W over RIO GRANDE RIVER |
Structure number: | RGDW03-03.60N |
Location: | .5 MI S OF CR 4N |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 68.6 ft. [20.9 m] |
Total length: | 141.1 ft. [43.0 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 31.2 ft. [9.5 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 32.2 ft. [9.8 m] |
Skew angle: | 20° |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1980 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Number of main spans: | 2 |
Main spans material: | Steel [3] |
Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Corrugated Steel [6] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: December 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 218 [as of 2017] |
Truck traffic: | 2% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 95.0 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
December 2018 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 218 | 95.0 |
December 2016 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 258 | 95.0 |
December 2014 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 258 | 96.0 |
December 2012 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 374 | 95.9 |
December 2010 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 374 | 96.9 |
December 2008 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 296 | 95.9 |
December 2006 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 296 | 95.9 |
October 2004 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 296 | 96.9 |
February 2003 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 296 | 96.9 |
March 2000 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 247 | 96.8 |
June 1999 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 247 | 96.8 |
June 1998 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 247 | 96.8 |
April 1996 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 228 | 96.8 |
March 1994 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 228 | 97.7 |
March 1992 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 228 | 97.7 |
November 1990 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 100 | 97.7 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Steel Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 1,837 | 1,737 | 100 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 1,837 | 1,737 | 0 | 25 | 75 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Wall | linear ft. | 34 | 30 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 68 | 33 | 35 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Corrugated or Orthotropic Deck | sq. ft. | 4,522 | 4,522 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 4,522 | 4,437 | 85 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 4,522 | 4,522 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Joints |
Compression Joint | linear ft. | 34 | 4 | 22 | 8 | 0 |
Bearings |
Elastomeric Bearing | each | 52 | 0 | 52 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 283 | 189 | 94 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 283 | 189 | 94 | 0 | 0 |