COUNTY ROAD 6W over RIO GRANDE CANAL
Map
Coordinates:
+37.68000, -106.2592937°40'48" N, 106°15'33" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | COUNTY ROAD 6W over RIO GRANDE CANAL |
Structure number: | RGDW06-07.30N |
Location: | .3 MI N OF CR 7N |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 27.9 ft. [8.5 m] |
Total length: | 29.9 ft. [9.1 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 24.0 ft. [7.3 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 24.0 ft. [7.3 m] |
Skew angle: | 15° |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1963 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Main span material: | Steel [3] |
Main span design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Corrugated Steel [6] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: December 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 29 [as of 2017] |
Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 83.6 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
December 2018 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 29 | 83.6 |
December 2016 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 24 | 84.6 |
December 2014 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 24 | 84.6 |
December 2012 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 50 | 84.6 |
December 2010 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 50 | 79.6 |
December 2008 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 41 | 79.6 |
December 2006 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 41 | 79.6 |
October 2004 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 41 | 79.6 |
February 2003 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 41 | 79.3 |
March 2000 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 40 | 79.0 |
March 1999 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 40 | 79.0 |
March 1998 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 40 | 79.0 |
April 1996 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 49 | 79.0 |
March 1994 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 49 | 90.2 |
March 1992 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 49 | 90.2 |
September 1990 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 105 | 83.7 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Steel Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 330 | 0 | 330 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 330 | 0 | 330 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 50 | 0 | 38 | 12 | 0 |
Deck |
Corrugated or Orthotropic Deck | sq. ft. | 723 | 0 | 645 | 78 | 0 |
Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 893 | 0 | 445 | 448 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 723 | 0 | 723 | 0 | 0 |
Bearings |
Movable Bearing | each | 11 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 60 | 40 | 20 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 60 | 40 | 20 | 0 | 0 |