Share: 
PALMER HILL ROAD over MIANUS RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+41.05759, -73.58228
41°03'27" N, 73°34'56" W
+41.05759, -73.58228
41°03'27" N, 73°34'56" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | PALMER HILL ROAD over MIANUS RIVER |
| Structure number: | 03958 |
| Location: | JCT VALLEY ROAD, PALMER |
| Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Minor Arterial (Urban) [16] |
| Length of largest span: | 40.0 ft. [12.2 m] |
| Total length: | 40.0 ft. [12.2 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 22.3 ft. [6.8 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 31.2 ft. [9.5 m] |
| Owner: | Town or Township Highway Agency [03] |
| Year built: | 1907 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is possibly eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [3] |
| Main span material: | Masonry [8] |
| Main span design: | Arch - Deck [11] |
| Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
| Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: June 2017
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 6,157 [as of 2017] |
| Truck traffic: | 3% of total traffic |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
| Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 64.6 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| June 2017 | Fair | - | Fair | Fair | 6157 | 64.6 |
| June 2015 | Fair | - | Fair | Fair | 5970 | 64.7 |
| June 2013 | Fair | - | Fair | Fair | 5916 | 64.7 |
| June 2011 | Poor | - | Poor | Fair | 6000 | 48.1 |
| October 2009 | Poor | - | Poor | Fair | 6000 | 48.1 |
| October 2007 | Poor | - | Poor | Fair | 5100 | 48.4 |
| May 2005 | Poor | - | Poor | Fair | 5100 | 48.4 |
| September 2003 | Poor | - | Poor | Fair | 5100 | 48.4 |
| June 2001 | Poor | - | Poor | Fair | 5100 | 48.4 |
| July 1999 | Poor | - | Poor | Fair | 5100 | 48.4 |
| April 1997 | Fair | - | Fair | Fair | 5100 | 66.9 |
| April 1995 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 5100 | 67.8 |
| May 1993 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Good | 5100 | 67.8 |
| May 1991 | Fair | - | Fair | Good | 5100 | 68.8 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1074620
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1074620