Share:

IRR BIA RTE 182 over WEST FEEDER CANAL

Hendry County, Florida

Map

Coordinates:
+26.30136, -81.07311
26°18'05" N, 81°04'23" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.

Name:	IRR BIA RTE 182 over WEST FEEDER CANAL
Structure number:	00000000000S304
Location:	9KM W INT. BIA 182 & 1281
Purpose:	Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:	Minor Collector (Rural) `[08]`
Length of largest span:	29.9 ft. `[9.1 m]`
Total length:	89.9 ft. `[27.4 m]`
Roadway width between curbs:	22.6 ft. `[6.9 m]`
Deck width edge-to-edge:	24.9 ft. `[7.6 m]`
Owner:	Bureau of Indian Affairs `[62]`
Year built:	1965
Historic significance:	Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places `[5]`
Design load:	M 13.5 / H 15 `[2]`
Number of main spans:	3
Main spans material:	Prestressed concrete `[5]`
Main spans design:	Slab `[01]`
Deck type:	Concrete Precast Panels `[2]`
Wearing surface:	Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) `[1]`

Latest Available Inspection: January 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:	Fair
Status:	Open, no restriction `[A]`
Average daily traffic:	120 `[as of 2017]`
Truck traffic:	3% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Fair `[5 out of 9]`
Superstructure condition:	Satisfactory `[6 out of 9]`
Substructure condition:	Good `[7 out of 9]`
Structural appraisal:	Equal to present minimum criteria `[6]`
Deck geometry appraisal:	Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is `[4]`
Water adequacy appraisal:	Better than present minimum criteria `[7]`
Roadway alignment appraisal:	Equal to present minimum criteria `[6]`
Channel protection:	Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. `[7]`
Scour condition:	Countermeasures have been installed to mitigate an existing problem with scour. `[7]`
Sufficiency rating:	86.3

Previous Inspections

Date	Condition	Deck	Superstructure	Substructure	ADT	Suff. Rating
January 2017	Fair	Fair	Satisfactory	Good	120	86.3
December 2014	Fair	Fair	Satisfactory	Good	120	86.3
February 2012	Poor	Poor	Poor	Satisfactory	210	57.2
January 2010	Poor	Poor	Satisfactory	Good	210	84.3
January 2008	Poor	Poor	Satisfactory	Good	210	84.3
January 2006	Fair	Satisfactory	Good	Good	210	82.3
March 2004	Fair	Satisfactory	Good	Good	210	82.3
November 2001	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	200	82.3
November 1998	Fair	Satisfactory	Good	Good	200	85.3
June 1997	Good	Good	Good	Good	200	82.3
December 1994	Good	Good	Good	Good	150	81.1
October 1992	Good	Good	Good	Good	150	84.1

© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1077713