I-75 NB over WILDLIFE CROSSING NO. 35
Map
Coordinates:
+26.17154, -80.9405626°10'18" N, 80°56'26" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | I-75 NB over WILDLIFE CROSSING NO. 35 |
Structure number: | 030280 |
Location: | 24.8MI E/O SR-29 (MM54.7) |
Route classification: | Principal Arterial - Interstate (Rural) [01] |
Tolls: | Yes, on Interstate toll segment under Secretarial Agreement [4] |
Length of largest span: | 40.0 ft. [12.2 m] |
Total length: | 120.1 ft. [36.6 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 39.7 ft. [12.1 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 43.0 ft. [13.1 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1990 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Concrete continuous [2] |
Main spans design: | Slab [01] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: April 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 11,250 [as of 2018] |
Truck traffic: | 16% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Scour condition: | Bridge not over waterway. [N] |
Sufficiency rating: | 89.9 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
April 2018 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 11250 | 89.9 |
April 2016 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 9900 | 90.0 |
April 2014 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 8550 | 90.0 |
April 2012 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 8750 | 90.0 |
April 2010 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 8000 | 90.0 |
April 2008 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 8750 | 94.5 |
April 2006 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 9250 | 94.5 |
April 2004 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 9350 | 95.5 |
April 2002 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 7850 | 95.6 |
March 2002 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 6400 | 95.7 |
March 2000 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 6100 | 89.6 |
March 1998 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 5300 | 89.7 |
July 1996 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 4700 | 89.3 |
November 1994 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 5000 | 84.3 |
October 1992 | Good | - | Excellent | Excellent | 3534 | 89.5 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 89 | 89 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Prestressed Concrete Pile | each | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap | linear ft. | 89 | 89 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Joints |
Pourable Joint | linear ft. | 86 | 86 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 243 | 241 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Slab | sq. ft. | 5,153 | 5,132 | 20 | 1 | 0 |
Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 4,756 | 4,739 | 0 | 17 | 0 |