SR-80 WB over GRANDMAS GROVE CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+26.73778, -81.4710126°44'16" N, 81°28'16" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | SR-80 WB over GRANDMAS GROVE CREEK |
Structure number: | 070062 |
Location: | 2.7 MI. W of SR-29 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Principal Arterial - Other (Rural) [02] |
Length of largest span: | 28.9 ft. [8.8 m] |
Total length: | 75.1 ft. [22.9 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 40.0 ft. [12.2 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 43.0 ft. [13.1 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1999 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Concrete continuous [2] |
Main spans design: | Slab [01] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: May 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 7,500 [as of 2017] |
Truck traffic: | 15% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 99.7 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
May 2017 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 7500 | 99.7 |
May 2015 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 5850 | 99.7 |
May 2013 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 5850 | 99.7 |
May 2011 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 6000 | 99.7 |
May 2009 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 5900 | 99.7 |
May 2007 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 7600 | 99.6 |
May 2005 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 6500 | 99.7 |
May 2003 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 5550 | 99.7 |
June 2002 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 5150 | 99.8 |
June 2000 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Very Good | 4900 | 99.8 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 86 | 77 | 0 | 9 | 0 |
Prestressed Concrete Pile | each | 8 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap | linear ft. | 86 | 85 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Joints |
Pourable Joint | linear ft. | 86 | 84 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 150 | 150 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Slab | sq. ft. | 3,255 | 3,176 | 79 | 0 | 0 |