Share:

HUFFMAN BLVD over CEDAR SWAMP CREEK

Map

Coordinates:
+30.29500, -81.50494
30°17'42" N, 81°30'18" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:HUFFMAN BLVD over CEDAR SWAMP CREEK
Structure number:724220
Location:0.5 MI NORTH OF US 90
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:12.1 ft. [3.7 m]
Total length:26.6 ft. [8.1 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:2005
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]

Latest Available Inspection: March 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:801 [as of 2017]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Culvert condition:Shrinkage cracks, light scaling and insignificant spalling which does not expose reinforcing steel. Insignificant damage caused by drift with no misalignment and not requiring corrective action. Some minor scouring has occured near curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth symmetrical curvature with superficial corrosion and no pitting. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:83.6

Previous Inspections

DateConditionCulvert ConditionADTSuff. Rating
March 2017Good7 out of 1080183.6
March 2015Good7 out of 1080183.6
March 2013Good7 out of 1080183.6
March 2011Good7 out of 1080184.6
April 2009Good7 out of 1080184.7
April 2007Good7 out of 1080184.7
April 2005Good7 out of 1080184.7