NW 7TH STREET over EL RIO CANAL
Map
Coordinates:
+26.35649, -80.0982526°21'23" N, 80°05'54" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | NW 7TH STREET over EL RIO CANAL |
Structure number: | 935221 |
Location: | 0.05 MI W of NW 4TH AVE |
Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Urban) [19] |
Length of largest span: | 39.0 ft. [11.9 m] |
Total length: | 116.1 ft. [35.4 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 31.2 ft. [9.5 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 44.3 ft. [13.5 m] |
Owner: | City or Municipal Highway Agency [04] |
Year built: | 1991 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
Main spans design: | Tee beam [04] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: September 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 6,400 [as of 2018] |
Truck traffic: | 3% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 89.0 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
September 2018 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 6400 | 89.0 |
September 2016 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 6400 | 89.0 |
September 2014 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 6400 | 89.0 |
September 2012 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 6400 | 89.0 |
September 2010 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 6400 | 88.3 |
September 2008 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 6400 | 88.3 |
September 2006 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 6400 | 83.2 |
November 2004 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 6400 | 83.2 |
November 2002 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 6400 | 84.2 |
March 2001 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 6400 | 84.2 |
March 1999 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 6400 | 84.2 |
March 1997 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 6400 | 84.2 |
March 1995 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 6400 | 85.3 |
January 1994 | Good | Very Good | Excellent | Excellent | 6400 | 81.7 |
January 1992 | Good | Very Good | Excellent | Excellent | - | 95.0 |