Share: 
LOCAL over SUGAR CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+41.09324, -91.67841
41°05'36" N, 91°40'42" W
+41.09324, -91.67841
41°05'36" N, 91°40'42" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | LOCAL over SUGAR CREEK |
| Structure number: | 000000000181571 |
| Location: | 073072802 |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
| Length of largest span: | 80.1 ft. [24.4 m] |
| Total length: | 82.0 ft. [25.0 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 24.0 ft. [7.3 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 25.9 ft. [7.9 m] |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 1976 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Main span material: | Steel [3] |
| Main span design: | Truss - Thru [10] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: February 2017
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
| Status: | Posted for other load-capacity restriction [R] |
| Average daily traffic: | 40 [as of 2014] |
| Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Structural appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
| Deck geometry appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 58.6 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| February 2017 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 40 | 58.6 |
| February 2015 | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | Fair | 40 | 43.6 |
| January 2013 | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | Satisfactory | 40 | 52.1 |
| January 2011 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 40 | 75.6 |
| January 2009 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 40 | 75.6 |
| January 2007 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 40 | 75.9 |
| February 2005 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 40 | 75.9 |
| April 2003 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 40 | 76.9 |
| February 2001 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 40 | 76.9 |
| August 1999 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 40 | 87.9 |
| April 1997 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 25 | 87.9 |
| May 1995 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 25 | 87.9 |
| July 1993 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 25 | 87.9 |
| June 1991 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 25 | 87.9 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1118188
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1118188