LOCAL over STREAM
Map
Coordinates:
+42.36847, -95.8890842°22'07" N, 95°53'21" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | LOCAL over STREAM |
Structure number: | 000000000351625 |
Location: | 0874307 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 28.9 ft. [8.8 m] |
Total length: | 28.9 ft. [8.8 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 20.0 ft. [6.1 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 23.6 ft. [7.2 m] |
Skew angle: | 47° |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1920 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is possibly eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [3] |
Main span material: | Concrete [1] |
Main span design: | Girder and floorbeam system [03] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Gravel [8] |
Latest Available Inspection: July 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 60 [as of 2015] |
Deck condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 31.9 |
Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
July 2017 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Poor | 60 | 31.9 |
June 2015 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Poor | 60 | 31.9 |
June 2013 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Poor | 60 | 31.9 |
June 2011 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Poor | 60 | 31.9 |
June 2009 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Poor | 60 | 33.9 |
July 2008 | Poor | Fair | Fair | Poor | 60 | 33.9 |
May 2006 | Poor | Fair | Fair | Poor | 60 | 33.9 |
May 2004 | Poor | Fair | Fair | Poor | 60 | 33.9 |
May 2002 | Poor | Fair | Fair | Poor | 20 | 34.0 |
April 2000 | Poor | Fair | Fair | Poor | 20 | 34.0 |
February 1998 | Poor | Fair | Fair | Poor | 30 | 39.2 |
February 1996 | Poor | Fair | Fair | Poor | 30 | 39.2 |
February 1994 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 30 | 51.3 |
June 1992 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 30 | 62.3 |
June 1990 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 40 | 78.0 |