I 15 SBL over I 86 EB RAMP

Map

Coordinates:
+42.91383, -112.44106
42°54'50" N, 112°26'28" W

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.

Name:	I 15 SBL over I 86 EB RAMP
Structure number:	000000000011285
Location:	2.9 N. POCATELLO
Purpose:	Carries highway overpass over highway
Route classification:	Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) `[11]`
Length of largest span:	98.1 ft. `[29.9 m]`
Total length:	229.0 ft. `[69.8 m]`
Roadway width between curbs:	38.1 ft. `[11.6 m]`
Deck width edge-to-edge:	40.0 ft. `[12.2 m]`
Vertical clearance below bridge:	16.4 ft. `[5.0 m]`
Skew angle:	51°
Owner:	State Highway Agency `[01]`
Year built:	1962
Historic significance:	Bridge is possibly eligible for the National Register of Historic Places `[3]`
Design load:	MS 18 / HS 20 `[5]`
Number of main spans:	3
Main spans material:	Prestressed concrete `[5]`
Main spans design:	Stringer/Multi-beam or girder `[02]`
Deck type:	Concrete Cast-in-Place `[1]`
Wearing surface:	Bituminous `[6]`

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:	Poor
Status:	Open, no restriction `[A]`
Average daily traffic:	16,000 `[as of 2016]`
Truck traffic:	13% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Satisfactory `[6 out of 9]`
Superstructure condition:	Poor `[4 out of 9]`
Substructure condition:	Satisfactory `[6 out of 9]`
Structural appraisal:	Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is `[4]`
Deck geometry appraisal:	Equal to present minimum criteria `[6]`
Underclearances appraisal:	Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is `[5]`
Roadway alignment appraisal:	Equal to present desirable criteria `[8]`
Scour condition:	Bridge not over waterway. `[N]`
Sufficiency rating:	68.9
Recommended work:	Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. `[31]`
Estimated cost of work:	$2,700,000

Date	Condition	Deck	Superstructure	Substructure	ADT	Suff. Rating
June 2018	Poor	Satisfactory	Poor	Satisfactory	16000	68.9
June 2017	Poor	Satisfactory	Poor	Satisfactory	15000	69.0
June 2016	Poor	Satisfactory	Poor	Satisfactory	15000	69.0
June 2015	Poor	Satisfactory	Poor	Satisfactory	14000	69.0
June 2014	Poor	Satisfactory	Poor	Satisfactory	14000	69.0
June 2013	Poor	Satisfactory	Poor	Satisfactory	14000	69.0
June 2012	Poor	Satisfactory	Poor	Satisfactory	14000	66.9
June 2011	Poor	Satisfactory	Poor	Satisfactory	14500	66.9
June 2010	Poor	Satisfactory	Poor	Satisfactory	14500	66.9
June 2009	Poor	Good	Poor	Satisfactory	14500	66.9
June 2008	Poor	Good	Poor	Satisfactory	14500	66.9
June 2006	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	14000	93.9
June 2004	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	14000	93.9
June 2002	Fair	Good	Good	Satisfactory	13500	94.9
June 2000	Fair	Good	Good	Satisfactory	17000	94.9
June 1998	Fair	Good	Good	Satisfactory	17000	94.9
June 1996	Fair	Good	Good	Satisfactory	16000	94.9
June 1994	Good	Good	Good	Good	16000	94.9
June 1992	Good	Good	Good	Good	11140	94.9
January 1991	Good	Good	Good	Good	11140	94.9

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.

Element	Units	Quantity	1-Good	2-Fair	3-Poor	4-Serious
Superstructure
Prestressed Concrete Girder/Beam	linear ft.	1,191	1,156	9	23	3
Deck
Reinforced Concrete Deck	sq. ft.	9,160	8,605	460	95	0
Wearing Surfaces	sq. ft.	8,702	8,702	0	0	0
Substructure
Reinforced Concrete Column	each	8	5	0	3	0
Reinforced Concrete Abutment	linear ft.	125	81	9	35	0
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap	linear ft.	125	115	5	5	0
Joints
Pourable Joint	linear ft.	253	201	44	8	0
Bearings
Elastomeric Bearing	each	23	15	8	0	0
Movable Bearing	each	7	0	7	0	0
Steel Protective Coating	sq. ft.	14	0	0	0	14
Bridge Rail
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail	linear ft.	458	303	135	20	0
Steel Protective Coating	sq. ft.	3,190	3,070	0	0	120