SH 97 over COEUR D'ALENE RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+47.46428, -116.7653147°27'51" N, 116°45'55" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | SH 97 over COEUR D'ALENE RIVER |
Structure number: | 000000000018901 |
Location: | 0.6 N. HARRISON |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
Length of largest span: | 194.9 ft. [59.4 m] |
Total length: | 606.0 ft. [184.7 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 44.0 ft. [13.4 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 46.3 ft. [14.1 m] |
Vertical clearance below bridge: | 19.7 ft. [6.0 m] |
Skew angle: | 12° |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 2007 |
Historic significance: | Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4] |
Number of main spans: | 4 |
Main spans material: | Steel continuous [4] |
Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: April 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 660 [as of 2016] |
Truck traffic: | 9% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Serious [3 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Pier/abutment protection: | None present but re-evaluation suggested [5] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 51.8 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Estimated cost of work: | $356,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
April 2018 | Poor | Fair | Very Good | Serious | 660 | 51.8 |
July 2017 | Poor | Fair | Very Good | Poor | 660 | 69.8 |
July 2016 | Poor | Fair | Very Good | Poor | 660 | 69.8 |
July 2015 | Poor | Fair | Very Good | Poor | 540 | 70.2 |
July 2014 | Poor | Satisfactory | Very Good | Poor | 540 | 71.2 |
July 2013 | Poor | Satisfactory | Very Good | Poor | 620 | 70.9 |
July 2012 | Poor | Satisfactory | Very Good | Poor | 620 | 66.9 |
July 2010 | Fair | Satisfactory | Very Good | Very Good | 620 | 95.4 |
July 2008 | Fair | Satisfactory | Excellent | Excellent | 470 | 96.2 |
March 2007 | Fair | Satisfactory | Excellent | Excellent | 470 | 73.5 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Steel Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 3,000 | 3,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 60,206 | 60,206 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 28,058 | 9,354 | 0 | 18,704 | 0 |
Concrete Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 26,664 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 26,664 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Column | each | 9 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Wall | linear ft. | 162 | 52 | 82 | 28 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 96 | 0 | 0 | 96 | 0 |
Steel Pile | each | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap | linear ft. | 138 | 138 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bearings |
Elastomeric Bearing | each | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Fixed Bearing | each | 15 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 1,312 | 0 | 1,312 | 0 | 0 |