CHERRY LANE over CLEARWATER RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+46.51406, -116.6795846°30'51" N, 116°40'46" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | CHERRY LANE over CLEARWATER RIVER |
Structure number: | 000000000029960 |
Location: | 2.4 E. MYRTLE |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 242.1 ft. [73.8 m] |
Total length: | 788.1 ft. [240.2 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 15.7 ft. [4.8 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 18.0 ft. [5.5 m] |
Vertical clearance above deck: | 12.1 ft. [3.7 m] |
Vertical clearance below bridge: | 19.7 ft. [6.0 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1919 |
Year reconstructed: | 1978 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is possibly eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [3] |
Design load: | M 9 / H 10 [1] |
Number of main spans: | 5 |
Main spans material: | Steel [3] |
Main spans design: | Truss - Thru [10] |
Deck type: | Wood or Timber [8] |
Wearing surface: | Other [9] |
Latest Available Inspection: September 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 350 [as of 2016] |
Truck traffic: | 9% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U] |
Sufficiency rating: | 29.6 |
Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
Estimated cost of work: | $5,969,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
September 2018 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 350 | 29.6 |
September 2016 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 350 | 29.6 |
September 2015 | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | Fair | 350 | 18.4 |
September 2014 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 350 | 18.4 |
September 2013 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 350 | 18.4 |
September 2012 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 350 | 18.4 |
September 2011 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 350 | 18.4 |
September 2010 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 350 | 18.4 |
September 2009 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Fair | 350 | 18.4 |
September 2008 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Fair | 350 | 18.4 |
September 2007 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Fair | 350 | 3.0 |
September 2006 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Good | 350 | 23.0 |
September 2005 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 350 | 23.0 |
October 2004 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 350 | 23.0 |
October 2003 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 90 | 26.2 |
October 2002 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 90 | 26.2 |
October 2000 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 90 | 28.4 |
October 1999 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 90 | 28.4 |
October 1998 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 90 | 28.4 |
April 1997 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 90 | 28.4 |
April 1996 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 90 | 28.4 |
April 1995 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 90 | 28.4 |
April 1994 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 90 | 28.4 |
April 1992 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 90 | 28.4 |
April 1991 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 90 | 28.4 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Timber Stringer | linear ft. | 7,881 | 7,571 | 310 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Truss | linear ft. | 1,575 | 1,361 | 182 | 32 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 12,608 | 1,588 | 10,000 | 820 | 200 |
Steel Floor Beam | linear ft. | 915 | 809 | 36 | 70 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 1,670 | 0 | 1,550 | 120 | 0 |
Steel Gusset Plate | each | 292 | 0 | 265 | 27 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 584 | 184 | 200 | 200 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Wall | linear ft. | 118 | 10 | 85 | 23 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 46 | 24 | 22 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pile Cap/Footing | linear ft. | 90 | 0 | 0 | 90 | 0 |
Joints |
Strip Seal Joint | linear ft. | 108 | 18 | 45 | 45 | 0 |
Deck |
Timber Deck | sq. ft. | 14,105 | 9,290 | 2,500 | 2,315 | 0 |
Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 4,728 | 4,183 | 0 | 545 | 0 |
Bearings |
Movable Bearing | each | 10 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 40 | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Fixed Bearing | each | 10 | 0 | 9 | 1 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 40 | 30 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 1,575 | 485 | 890 | 200 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 4,728 | 1,328 | 3,000 | 400 | 0 |