4TH OF JULY CRK over FOURTH OF JULY CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+47.57250, -116.4416747°34'21" N, 116°26'30" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | 4TH OF JULY CRK over FOURTH OF JULY CREEK |
Structure number: | 000000000030410 |
Location: | AT ROSE LAKE JCT. |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 39.0 ft. [11.9 m] |
Total length: | 40.0 ft. [12.2 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 24.3 ft. [7.4 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 26.6 ft. [8.1 m] |
Owner: | Other Local Agencies [25] |
Year built: | 1962 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is possibly eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [3] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Main span material: | Concrete [1] |
Main span design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: June 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 20 [as of 2015] |
Truck traffic: | 5% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 91.6 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
June 2017 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 20 | 91.6 |
June 2013 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 20 | 91.6 |
June 2011 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 20 | 91.6 |
June 2009 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 20 | 91.6 |
June 2007 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 20 | 91.5 |
June 2005 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 20 | 91.5 |
June 2003 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 20 | 91.5 |
June 2001 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 20 | 91.5 |
June 1999 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 20 | 91.5 |
June 1997 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 20 | 91.5 |
June 1995 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 20 | 91.6 |
August 1993 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 20 | 91.6 |
August 1991 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 20 | 91.6 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Reinforced Concrete Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 194 | 144 | 50 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Top Flange | sq. ft. | 1,055 | 942 | 113 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 84 | 74 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 108 | 94 | 14 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 270 | 243 | 0 | 0 | 27 |