Share:

COUNTY ROAD over COUGAR CREEK

Map

Coordinates:
+47.65944, -116.83583
47°39'34" N, 116°50'09" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:COUNTY ROAD over COUGAR CREEK
Structure number:000000000030425
Location:0.9S. 2.5W. COEUR D'ALENE
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:28.9 ft. [8.8 m]
Total length:33.1 ft. [10.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:16.4 ft. [5.0 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:16.4 ft. [5.0 m]
Owner:Other Local Agencies [25]
Year built:1940
Year reconstructed:1989
Historic significance:Bridge is possibly eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [3]
Design load:M 9 / H 10 [1]
Main span material:Wood or timber [7]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Wood or Timber [8]
Wearing surface:Wood or Timber [7]

Latest Available Inspection: August 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:10 [as of 2015]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U]
Sufficiency rating:72.4
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$411,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
August 2017FairGoodSatisfactoryGood1072.4
August 2015FairGoodSatisfactoryGood1072.4
August 2014PoorPoorSatisfactoryCritical1025.2
August 2013PoorFairSatisfactorySerious1027.3
August 2012PoorFairSatisfactorySerious1027.3
August 2011PoorFairSatisfactorySerious1027.3
August 2010PoorFairSatisfactorySerious1027.3
August 2009PoorFairSatisfactorySerious1027.3
August 2008PoorFairSatisfactorySerious1027.1
August 2007FairFairSatisfactoryFair1049.8
August 2006FairFairSatisfactoryFair1049.8
August 2005FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair1050.8
August 2004FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair1050.8
August 2003PoorSatisfactorySatisfactoryPoor1042.7
August 2002PoorSatisfactorySatisfactoryPoor1042.7
August 2000PoorSatisfactorySatisfactoryPoor1042.7
August 1999PoorSatisfactorySatisfactoryPoor1042.7
August 1998PoorSatisfactorySatisfactoryPoor1042.7
August 1997PoorSatisfactorySatisfactoryPoor1042.7
August 1996FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair1046.8
August 1995FairGoodGoodFair1046.8
August 1994FairGoodGoodFair1044.8
August 1993FairGoodGoodSatisfactory1046.8
August 1992FairGoodGoodSatisfactory1046.8
August 1991FairGoodGoodSatisfactory1046.8

Element Data

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
ElementUnitsQuantity1-Good2-Fair3-Poor4-Serious
Superstructure
Timber Girder/Beamlinear ft.256025600
Substructure
Timber Abutmentlinear ft.3333000
Deck
Timber Decksq. ft.517517000
Wearing Surfacessq. ft.232232000