Share: 
TR 124 over BEAR CRK.
Map
Coordinates:
+40.16449, -91.30905
40°09'52" N, 91°18'33" W
+40.16449, -91.30905
40°09'52" N, 91°18'33" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | TR 124 over BEAR CRK. |
| Structure number: | 001309700000000 |
| Old structure number: | 000001309700739 (from 1992 edition) |
| Location: | 4.5 MI W LORAINE |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
| Length of largest span: | 143.1 ft. [43.6 m] |
| Total length: | 145.0 ft. [44.2 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 15.7 ft. [4.8 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 16.1 ft. [4.9 m] |
| Owner: | Town or Township Highway Agency [03] |
| Year built: | 1922 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Main span material: | Steel [3] |
| Main span design: | Truss - Thru [10] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: March 2018
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 50 [as of 2008] |
| Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Structural appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
| Deck geometry appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 22.1 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $308,000 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| March 2018 | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Poor | 50 | 22.1 |
| March 2016 | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Poor | 50 | 22.1 |
| March 2014 | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Poor | 50 | 22.1 |
| December 2011 | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Poor | 50 | 22.1 |
| December 2009 | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Poor | 50 | 22.1 |
| December 2007 | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Poor | 100 | 21.9 |
| November 2005 | Poor | Good | Satisfactory | Poor | 100 | 21.9 |
| February 2004 | Poor | Good | Satisfactory | Poor | 100 | 21.9 |
| January 2002 | Poor | Good | Satisfactory | Poor | 100 | 21.9 |
| January 2000 | Poor | Good | Satisfactory | Poor | 75 | 22.0 |
| 2000 | Poor | Good | Satisfactory | Poor | 75 | 22.0 |
| January 1998 | Poor | Good | Satisfactory | Poor | 75 | 22.0 |
| January 1996 | Poor | Good | Satisfactory | Poor | 75 | 22.0 |
| February 1994 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 79 | 45.3 |
| February 1992 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 79 | 45.3 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1135167
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1135167