Share:

N ELIZABETH ROUTE over PLUM RIVER

Map

Coordinates:
+42.14854, -90.05235
42°08'55" N, 90°03'08" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:N ELIZABETH ROUTE over PLUM RIVER
Structure number:008310800000000
Old structure number:000008310801796 (from 1992 edition)
Location:4MILES NW MT.CARROLL
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Major Collector (Rural) [07]
Length of largest span:76.4 ft. [23.3 m]
Total length:259.2 ft. [79.0 m]
Roadway width between curbs:29.9 ft. [9.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:29.9 ft. [9.1 m]
Skew angle:30°
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1961
Year reconstructed:2000
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 13.5 / HS 15 [3]
Number of main spans:4
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]

Latest Available Inspection: May 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:450 [as of 2016]
Truck traffic:13% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Sufficiency rating:99.8
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$576,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
May 2016GoodGoodGoodVery Good45099.8
June 2015GoodGoodGoodVery Good37594.8
December 2011GoodVery GoodExcellentVery Good37594.8
July 2010GoodVery GoodExcellentVery Good37594.8
May 2009GoodVery GoodExcellentVery Good37594.8
April 2007GoodExcellentExcellentVery Good37587.3
May 2005GoodExcellentExcellentVery Good45087.2
March 2003GoodExcellentExcellentVery Good45074.2
September 2001GoodExcellentExcellentVery Good45074.2
April 1999PoorPoorSatisfactoryVery Good35065.0
November 1996FairSatisfactoryGoodVery Good30067.0
April 1994GoodGoodGoodVery Good35066.5
July 1991FairGoodSatisfactoryVery Good35066.5