CR 100S over BUCK Creek
Map
Coordinates:
+39.00916, -87.1091239°00'33" N, 87°06'33" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | CR 100S over BUCK Creek |
Structure number: | 2800165 |
Location: | 00.00 Int of CR 900 W |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 56.8 ft. [17.3 m] |
Total length: | 60.0 ft. [18.3 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 12.5 ft. [3.8 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 13.1 ft. [4.0 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1905 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [2] |
Main span material: | Steel [3] |
Main span design: | Truss - Thru [10] |
Deck type: | Wood or Timber [8] |
Wearing surface: | Wood or Timber [7] |
Latest Available Inspection: July 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
Status: | Bridge closed to all traffic [K] |
Average daily traffic: | 110 [as of 2011] |
Truck traffic: | 2% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 16.3 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Estimated cost of work: | $150,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
July 2017 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | 110 | 16.3 |
July 2016 | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | Satisfactory | 110 | 19.7 |
July 2015 | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | Satisfactory | 110 | 19.7 |
July 2013 | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | Satisfactory | 110 | 19.7 |
July 2011 | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | Satisfactory | 110 | 19.7 |
July 2009 | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | Satisfactory | 110 | 19.7 |
January 2007 | Fair | Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 110 | 30.1 |
December 2004 | Fair | Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 110 | 30.1 |
January 2003 | Fair | Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 110 | 32.2 |
April 2001 | Poor | Fair | Serious | Satisfactory | 100 | 23.9 |
December 1998 | Poor | Satisfactory | Serious | Fair | 100 | 24.9 |
December 1996 | Poor | Poor | Serious | Fair | 100 | 21.8 |
October 1994 | Poor | Fair | Serious | Fair | 100 | 23.9 |
September 1992 | Poor | Fair | Serious | Fair | 100 | 23.9 |
August 1990 | Poor | Fair | Serious | Fair | 100 | 23.7 |