Share:

RS 477 J.0 - 2010 over TRIB. TO NEOSHO RIVER

Map

Coordinates:
+38.76833, -96.70611
38°46'06" N, 96°42'22" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:RS 477 J.0 - 2010 over TRIB. TO NEOSHO RIVER
Structure number:000000000640026
Location:1.4S 1.9E OF WHITE CITY
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Major Collector (Rural) [07]
Length of largest span:9.8 ft. [3.0 m]
Total length:22.0 ft. [6.7 m]
Roadway width between curbs:30.8 ft. [9.4 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:32.5 ft. [9.9 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1940
Historic significance:Bridge is possibly eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [3]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]

Latest Available Inspection: April 2018

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:121 [as of 2011]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Culvert condition:Deterioration or initial disintegration, minor chloride contamination, cracking with some leaching, or spalls on concrete or masonry walls and slabs. Local minor scouring at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth curvature, non-symmetrical shape, significant corrosion or moderate pitting. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:84.0

Previous Inspections

DateConditionCulvert ConditionADTSuff. Rating
April 2018Fair6 out of 1012184.0
February 2016Fair6 out of 1012184.0
October 2013Good7 out of 1012184.0
October 2011Fair6 out of 1012184.0
December 2009Fair6 out of 1012184.0
November 2007Fair6 out of 1012184.0
June 2005Fair6 out of 1012184.0
February 2003Good8 out of 1012182.0
January 2001Good8 out of 1012181.9
March 1999Good8 out of 1012182.3
February 1997Good8 out of 1012182.3
June 1995Good8 out of 1012181.9
November 1993Good8 out of 1012181.9
July 1991Good8 out of 1011581.9