This bridge is no longer in the current National Bridge Inventory database, and has likely been demolished or abandoned.


+37.24466, -96.46691
37°14'41" N, 96°28'01" W


Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:LOCAL D.2-5.0 over CANEY RIVER
Structure number:000100913206800
Location:1.0N 1.0E OF CLOVERDALE
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:88.9 ft. [27.1 m]
Total length:149.9 ft. [45.7 m]
Roadway width between curbs:18.0 ft. [5.5 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:18.0 ft. [5.5 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1930
Historic significance:Bridge is possibly eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [3]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Truss - Thru [10]
Deck type:Corrugated Steel [6]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: August 2015

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:10 [as of 2013]
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Channel protection:Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5]
Scour condition:Countermeasures have been installed to mitigate an existing problem with scour. [7]
Sufficiency rating:45.3
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$700,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
August 2015FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood1045.3
February 2014FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory1045.3
November 2011FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood1045.3
May 2009FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood1045.3
May 2007FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood1045.3
July 2005FairFairSatisfactoryGood1047.8
July 2003FairFairSatisfactoryGood1047.8
April 2001FairFairSatisfactoryGood1047.8
February 1999FairFairSatisfactoryGood1048.0
January 1997FairFairSatisfactoryGood1047.8
February 1995FairFairSatisfactoryGood1047.8
January 1993FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood1048.8
February 1991FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood1048.8