LOCAL RD. 58 over BIG TIMBER CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+39.95351, -101.5044439°57'13" N, 101°30'16" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | LOCAL RD. 58 over BIG TIMBER CREEK |
Structure number: | 000120375003064 |
Location: | 13.5N 2.0E OF BIRD CITY |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 29.9 ft. [9.1 m] |
Total length: | 32.2 ft. [9.8 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 19.4 ft. [5.9 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 20.3 ft. [6.2 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1940 |
Year reconstructed: | 2015 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is possibly eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [3] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Main span material: | Steel [3] |
Main span design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Wood or Timber [8] |
Wearing surface: | Gravel [8] |
Latest Available Inspection: January 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 10 [as of 2014] |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 48.6 |
Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
Estimated cost of work: | $180,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
January 2017 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 10 | 48.6 |
December 2015 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 10 | 64.5 |
January 2015 | Poor | Satisfactory | Serious | Fair | 10 | 40.0 |
January 2014 | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | Fair | 10 | 40.0 |
January 2013 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 10 | 40.0 |
December 2011 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 10 | 40.0 |
January 2011 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 10 | 40.0 |
February 2010 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 10 | 40.0 |
December 2008 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 10 | 40.0 |
April 2007 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 10 | 40.0 |
March 2005 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 10 | 40.0 |
January 2003 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 10 | 40.0 |
January 2001 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 10 | 40.0 |
December 1998 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 10 | 40.0 |
January 1997 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Good | 10 | 47.0 |
February 1995 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 10 | 46.0 |
May 1993 | Fair | Good | Fair | Good | 10 | 39.0 |
July 1991 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Good | 10 | 38.0 |