RD 75 961.9-538.5 over STREAM
Map
Coordinates:
+38.26708, -96.0064738°16'01" N, 96°00'23" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | RD 75 961.9-538.5 over STREAM |
Structure number: | 000560961905385 |
Location: | 3.0S 3.0W OF HARTFORD |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 24.9 ft. [7.6 m] |
Total length: | 26.2 ft. [8.0 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 20.3 ft. [6.2 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 21.3 ft. [6.5 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1932 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is possibly eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [3] |
Main span material: | Steel [3] |
Main span design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Gravel [8] |
Latest Available Inspection: April 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 10 [as of 2007] |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour conditions; field review indicates action is required. [4] |
Sufficiency rating: | 67.4 |
Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
Estimated cost of work: | $51,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
April 2017 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 10 | 67.4 |
February 2017 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 10 | 47.6 |
April 2015 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 10 | 67.4 |
May 2013 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 10 | 73.3 |
March 2011 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 10 | 73.3 |
June 2009 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 10 | 73.3 |
May 2007 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 10 | 68.3 |
January 2005 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 10 | 68.3 |
January 2003 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Good | 10 | 58.3 |
May 2001 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Good | 10 | 58.3 |
February 1999 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Good | 10 | 58.5 |
June 1997 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Good | 10 | 58.5 |
April 1995 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Good | 10 | 58.3 |
April 1993 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Good | 10 | 58.3 |
March 1991 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Good | 10 | 58.3 |