R-6.5 LOCAL over TRIB. TO PIPE CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+39.22695, -97.6121239°13'37" N, 97°36'44" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | R-6.5 LOCAL over TRIB. TO PIPE CREEK |
Structure number: | 000720791004065 |
Location: | 2.0S 2.0W OF LAMAR |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 44.9 ft. [13.7 m] |
Total length: | 45.9 ft. [14.0 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 15.7 ft. [4.8 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 16.1 ft. [4.9 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1920 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is possibly eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [3] |
Main span material: | Steel [3] |
Main span design: | Truss - Thru [10] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: March 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 30 [as of 2001] |
Deck condition: | Serious [3 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Serious [3 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour conditions; field review indicates action is required. [4] |
Sufficiency rating: | 21.2 |
Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
Estimated cost of work: | $275,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
March 2018 | Poor | Serious | Poor | Serious | 30 | 21.2 |
December 2016 | Poor | Serious | Poor | Serious | 30 | 21.2 |
February 2016 | Poor | Serious | Poor | Serious | 30 | 21.2 |
January 2015 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Poor | 30 | 25.2 |
December 2013 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Poor | 30 | 25.2 |
February 2013 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Fair | 30 | 37.6 |
January 2012 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | 30 | 39.6 |
December 2009 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | 30 | 39.6 |
February 2008 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | 30 | 36.8 |
March 2006 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | 30 | 39.6 |
December 2001 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | 30 | 39.6 |
December 1999 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | 30 | 39.8 |
December 1997 | Fair | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | 30 | 49.8 |
January 1996 | Fair | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | 30 | 49.3 |
September 1993 | Fair | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | 30 | 49.3 |
October 1991 | Fair | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | 30 | 49.3 |