LOCAL RD. 16-F.5 over ROSE CREEK

This bridge is no longer in the current National Bridge Inventory database, and has likely been demolished or abandoned.

Map

Coordinates:
+39.92187, -97.65156
39°55'19" N, 97°39'06" W

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.

Name:	LOCAL RD. 16-F.5 over ROSE CREEK
Structure number:	000790787003105
Location:	0.5N 6.0W OF MUNDEN
Purpose:	Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:	Local (Rural) `[09]`
Length of largest span:	29.9 ft. `[9.1 m]`
Total length:	32.2 ft. `[9.8 m]`
Roadway width between curbs:	16.1 ft. `[4.9 m]`
Deck width edge-to-edge:	16.1 ft. `[4.9 m]`
Owner:	County Highway Agency `[02]`
Historic significance:	Bridge is possibly eligible for the National Register of Historic Places `[3]`
Design load:	M 9 / H 10 `[1]`
Main span material:	Steel `[3]`
Main span design:	Truss - Thru `[10]`
Deck type:	Wood or Timber `[8]`
Wearing surface:	Other `[9]`

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:	Poor
Status:	Posted for load `[P]`
Average daily traffic:	10 `[as of 2014]`
Deck condition:	Satisfactory `[6 out of 9]`
Superstructure condition:	Poor `[4 out of 9]`
Substructure condition:	Serious `[3 out of 9]`
Structural appraisal:	Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement `[2]`
Deck geometry appraisal:	Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action `[3]`
Water adequacy appraisal:	Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is `[5]`
Roadway alignment appraisal:	Equal to present desirable criteria `[8]`
Channel protection:	Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. `[6]`
Scour condition:	Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour conditions; field review indicates action is required. `[4]`
Sufficiency rating:	23.5
Recommended work:	Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. `[31]`
Estimated cost of work:	$230,000

Date	Condition	Deck	Superstructure	Substructure	ADT	Suff. Rating
September 2014	Poor	Satisfactory	Poor	Serious	10	23.5
August 2013	Poor	Satisfactory	Poor	Serious	10	23.5
August 2012	Poor	Satisfactory	Poor	Serious	10	23.5
September 2011	Poor	Satisfactory	Poor	Serious	10	23.5
October 2010	Poor	Satisfactory	Poor	Serious	10	23.5
September 2008	Poor	Satisfactory	Poor	Serious	10	23.5
October 2007	Poor	Satisfactory	Poor	Poor	10	24.5
September 2006	Poor	Satisfactory	Poor	Poor	10	24.5
October 2004	Poor	Satisfactory	Poor	Fair	10	24.5
October 2002	Poor	Satisfactory	Poor	Fair	10	24.5
September 2000	Poor	Satisfactory	Poor	Fair	10	24.5
December 1998	Poor	Satisfactory	Poor	Fair	10	24.5
January 1997	Poor	Satisfactory	Poor	Poor	10	22.5
March 1995	Poor	Satisfactory	Poor	Good	10	22.5
March 1993	Poor	Fair	Poor	Good	10	21.5
March 1991	Poor	Satisfactory	Poor	Good	10	20.5