LOOP ROAD (OLD KY over GEORGES BRANCH
Map
Coordinates:
+37.38444, -84.8700037°23'04" N, 84°52'12" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | LOOP ROAD (OLD KY over GEORGES BRANCH |
Structure number: | 023C00098N |
Location: | .4 MI SW OF N-JCT US 127 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 24.0 ft. [7.3 m] |
Total length: | 24.0 ft. [7.3 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 20.0 ft. [6.1 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 21.0 ft. [6.4 m] |
Skew angle: | 30° |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1925 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
Main span material: | Concrete [1] |
Main span design: | Tee beam [04] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: October 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 312 [as of 2010] |
Truck traffic: | 11% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 68.2 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
October 2018 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 312 | 68.2 |
October 2016 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 312 | 70.0 |
October 2014 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 312 | 70.0 |
October 2012 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 312 | 70.0 |
October 2010 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 340 | 81.0 |
October 2008 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 340 | 81.0 |
October 2006 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 346 | 81.0 |
October 2004 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 254 | 81.0 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Reinforced Concrete Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 133 | 88 | 22 | 23 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Top Flange | sq. ft. | 503 | 0 | 488 | 15 | 0 |
Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 485 | 395 | 90 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 106 | 31 | 48 | 27 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pile Cap/Footing | linear ft. | 48 | 48 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 53 | 0 | 18 | 35 | 0 |