Share: 
WILLIE WEBB ROAD over BEAVERDAM CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+37.19611, -86.27556
37°11'46" N, 86°16'32" W
+37.19611, -86.27556
37°11'46" N, 86°16'32" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | WILLIE WEBB ROAD over BEAVERDAM CREEK |
| Structure number: | 031C00007N |
| Location: | .02 MI W JCT KY 259 |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
| Length of largest span: | 58.1 ft. [17.7 m] |
| Total length: | 63.0 ft. [19.2 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 14.4 ft. [4.4 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 16.1 ft. [4.9 m] |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 1990 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | MS 22.5 / HS 25 [9] |
| Main span material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
| Main span design: | Box beam or girders - Multiple [05] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: December 2017
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 43 [as of 2012] |
| Truck traffic: | 7% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Deck geometry appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Countermeasures have been installed to mitigate an existing problem with scour. [7] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 75.2 |
| Recommended work: | Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $128,000 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 2017 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 43 | 75.2 |
| December 2015 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 43 | 77.2 |
| December 2013 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 43 | 77.2 |
| January 2012 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 12 | 77.3 |
| December 2009 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 12 | 77.3 |
| January 2008 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 12 | 75.3 |
| November 2005 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 10 | 75.3 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
| Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Superstructure | ||||||
| Prestressed Concrete Closed Web/Box Girder | linear ft. | 252 | 242 | 8 | 2 | 0 |
| Deck | ||||||
| Prestressed Concrete Top Flange | sq. ft. | 1,008 | 1,008 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Substructure | ||||||
| Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 32 | 32 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Bearings | ||||||
| Elastomeric Bearing | each | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Bridge Rail | ||||||
| Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 126 | 121 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 630 | 0 | 630 | 0 | 0 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1210294
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1210294