KY-78 over BAUGHMAN CREEK @HUSTONVL
Map
Coordinates:
+37.47167, -84.8211137°28'18" N, 84°49'16" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | KY-78 over BAUGHMAN CREEK @HUSTONVL |
Structure number: | 069B00025N |
Old structure number: | 069*0078*B0025 (from 1992 edition) |
Location: | .07 MI EAST OF JCT US 127 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
Length of largest span: | 29.9 ft. [9.1 m] |
Total length: | 65.9 ft. [20.1 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 21.7 ft. [6.6 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 24.0 ft. [7.3 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1940 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
Number of main spans: | 2 |
Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
Main spans design: | Tee beam [04] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Latex Concrete or similar additive [3] |
Latest Available Inspection: April 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 1,284 [as of 2015] |
Truck traffic: | 9% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Superior to present desirable criteria [9] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 67.5 |
Recommended work: | Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34] |
Estimated cost of work: | $198,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
April 2018 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 1284 | 67.5 |
April 2016 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 1284 | 68.3 |
April 2014 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 1403 | 68.2 |
April 2012 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 1550 | 79.3 |
April 2010 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 1370 | 79.3 |
April 2008 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 1510 | 79.3 |
April 2006 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 1479 | 79.3 |
April 2004 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 1550 | 79.3 |
April 2000 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 1550 | 77.3 |
April 1998 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 1550 | 77.3 |
April 1996 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 1550 | 73.2 |
April 1994 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 902 | 74.9 |
April 1992 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 902 | 74.9 |
April 1990 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 902 | 74.9 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Reinforced Concrete Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 264 | 240 | 12 | 12 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Top Flange | sq. ft. | 1,579 | 1,484 | 25 | 70 | 0 |
Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 1,436 | 1,346 | 20 | 70 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Column | each | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 106 | 89 | 5 | 12 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap | linear ft. | 23 | 0 | 13 | 10 | 0 |
Joints |
Pourable Joint | linear ft. | 22 | 0 | 0 | 22 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 30 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 120 | 120 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 132 | 0 | 132 | 0 | 0 |