OLD MOUNTAIN ASH P over CSX RR @ OLD W-BRG-JELCO
Map
Coordinates:
+36.67250, -84.1272236°40'21" N, 84°07'38" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | OLD MOUNTAIN ASH P over CSX RR @ OLD W-BRG-JELCO |
Structure number: | 118C00049N |
Location: | 0.1 MI. S.-JCT. US 25W |
Purpose: | Carries highway over railroad |
Route classification: | Local (Urban) [19] |
Length of largest span: | 53.2 ft. [16.2 m] |
Total length: | 160.1 ft. [48.8 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 24.0 ft. [7.3 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 27.6 ft. [8.4 m] |
Vertical clearance below bridge: | 19.7 ft. [6.0 m] |
Skew angle: | 45° |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1934 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
Main spans design: | Tee beam [04] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: November 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 100 [as of 2006] |
Truck traffic: | 12% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Underclearances appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Scour condition: | Bridge not over waterway. [N] |
Sufficiency rating: | 63.8 |
Recommended work: | Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34] |
Estimated cost of work: | $548,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
November 2018 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 100 | 63.8 |
November 2016 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 100 | 63.8 |
November 2014 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 100 | 56.9 |
November 2012 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 100 | 56.0 |
November 2010 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 100 | 57.1 |
November 2008 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 100 | 64.4 |
November 2006 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 100 | 63.4 |
September 2004 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 100 | 64.4 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Reinforced Concrete Closed Web/Box Girder | linear ft. | 800 | 780 | 20 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 4,412 | 3,617 | 775 | 20 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Column | each | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 74 | 70 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap | linear ft. | 56 | 44 | 10 | 2 | 0 |
Joints |
Pourable Joint | linear ft. | 54 | 36 | 18 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 320 | 0 | 320 | 0 | 0 |