HWY WESTERN AVE over WATER CHARLES RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+42.36425, -71.1169042°21'51" N, 71°07'01" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | HWY WESTERN AVE over WATER CHARLES RIVER |
Structure number: | B160104EPDOTNBI |
Old structure number: | MDC896036100 (from 1992 edition) |
Location: | CITY LINE BOS CAMB |
Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
Route classification: | Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14] |
Length of largest span: | 87.9 ft. [26.8 m] |
Total length: | 279.9 ft. [85.3 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 40.0 ft. [12.2 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 60.0 ft. [18.3 m] |
Vertical clearance below bridge: | 9.8 ft. [3.0 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1924 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is on the National Register of Historic Places [1] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
Main spans design: | Arch - Deck [11] |
Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
Latest Available Inspection: November 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 27,500 [as of 2017] |
Truck traffic: | 9% of total traffic |
Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 48.0 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Estimated cost of work: | $8,153,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
November 2017 | Fair | - | Fair | Satisfactory | 27500 | 48.0 |
November 2015 | Fair | - | Fair | Satisfactory | 20043 | 48.0 |
November 2013 | Fair | - | Fair | Satisfactory | 30000 | 48.0 |
November 2011 | Fair | - | Fair | Satisfactory | 30000 | 48.0 |
November 2009 | Fair | - | Fair | Satisfactory | 33000 | 63.3 |
November 1999 | Fair | - | Good | Satisfactory | 8900 | 78.9 |
November 1995 | Fair | - | Good | Satisfactory | 13867 | 78.7 |
November 1993 | Fair | - | Good | Satisfactory | 23564 | 77.8 |
November 1991 | Fair | - | Good | Fair | 24000 | 65.3 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Reinforced Concrete Arch | linear ft. | 180 | 4 | 36 | 140 | 0 |
Substructure |
Masonry Pier Wall | linear ft. | 120 | 0 | 80 | 40 | 0 |
Masonry Abutment | linear ft. | 160 | 0 | 160 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 560 | 94 | 261 | 205 | 0 |