HWY CHURCH ST over WATER KEYUP BROOK
Map
Coordinates:
+42.60244, -72.3996442°36'09" N, 72°23'59" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | HWY CHURCH ST over WATER KEYUP BROOK |
Structure number: | E100110PWMUNNBI |
Old structure number: | 0PWTWN216011100 (from 1992 edition) |
Location: | 0.2 MI N OF ST 2 |
Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
Length of largest span: | 22.0 ft. [6.7 m] |
Total length: | 25.9 ft. [7.9 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 24.6 ft. [7.5 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 32.2 ft. [9.8 m] |
Skew angle: | 35° |
Owner: | Town or Township Highway Agency [03] |
Year built: | 1940 |
Historic significance: | Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4] |
Main span material: | Concrete [1] |
Main span design: | Slab [01] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: December 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 905 [as of 2018] |
Truck traffic: | 6% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour conditions; field review indicates action is required. [4] |
Sufficiency rating: | 38.7 |
Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
Estimated cost of work: | $1,468,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
December 2018 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | 905 | 38.7 |
December 2016 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | 300 | 40.9 |
December 2014 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | 300 | 40.9 |
December 2012 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | 300 | 40.9 |
December 2010 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | 300 | 40.9 |
December 2008 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | 300 | 51.9 |
December 2006 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | 300 | 50.9 |
December 2004 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | 300 | 50.9 |
December 2002 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | 300 | 50.9 |
December 2000 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | 389 | 50.9 |
December 1998 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | 500 | 49.9 |
January 1997 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | 500 | 56.4 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 80 | 62 | 16 | 2 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 52 | 0 | 52 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Slab | sq. ft. | 832 | 453 | 119 | 260 | 0 |
Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 637 | 637 | 0 | 0 | 0 |