HWY AMES AVE over WATER HITHER CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+41.27228, -70.2037341°16'20" N, 70°12'13" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | HWY AMES AVE over WATER HITHER CREEK |
Structure number: | N02003442MUNNBI |
Old structure number: | 442TWN729002100 (from 1992 edition) |
Location: | .1 MI NW OF MADAKET RD |
Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 13.8 ft. [4.2 m] |
Total length: | 98.1 ft. [29.9 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 20.0 ft. [6.1 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 25.3 ft. [7.7 m] |
Owner: | Town or Township Highway Agency [03] |
Year built: | 1946 |
Year reconstructed: | 1983 |
Historic significance: | Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4] |
Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
Number of main spans: | 7 |
Main spans material: | Wood or timber [7] |
Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Wood or Timber [8] |
Wearing surface: | Wood or Timber [7] |
Latest Available Inspection: May 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 500 [as of 2017] |
Truck traffic: | 10% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 34.0 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Estimated cost of work: | $1,213,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
May 2017 | Fair | Very Good | Good | Satisfactory | 500 | 34.0 |
May 2015 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 500 | 34.0 |
May 2013 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 500 | 34.0 |
May 2011 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Good | 900 | 4.0 |
May 2009 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Good | 900 | 18.6 |
September 2008 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Good | 900 | 18.6 |
September 2006 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | 900 | 28.6 |
September 2004 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Good | 1200 | 19.6 |
September 2002 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 1200 | 58.6 |
September 2000 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 1200 | 59.6 |
September 1998 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 1050 | 60.4 |
September 1996 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 300 | 71.5 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Timber Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 1,588 | 1,442 | 146 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Timber Abutment | linear ft. | 51 | 49 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Timber Pile | each | 32 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 0 |
Timber Pier Cap | linear ft. | 181 | 150 | 31 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Timber Deck | sq. ft. | 2,224 | 2,224 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Timber Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 196 | 152 | 44 | 0 | 0 |