MD 181(SIXTH ST) over SPA CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+38.97267, -76.4855038°58'22" N, 76°29'08" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | MD 181(SIXTH ST) over SPA CREEK |
Structure number: | 100000020053010 |
Location: | ANNAPOLIS MD. |
Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
Route classification: | Minor Arterial (Urban) [16] |
Length of largest span: | 62.0 ft. [18.9 m] |
Total length: | 832.1 ft. [253.6 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 25.9 ft. [7.9 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 39.0 ft. [11.9 m] |
Vertical clearance below bridge: | 16.4 ft. [5.0 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1946 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is possibly eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [3] |
Design load: | M 18 / H 20 [4] |
Main span material: | Steel [3] |
Main span design: | Movable - Bascule [16] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Latex Concrete or similar additive [3] |
Latest Available Inspection: February 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 19,251 [as of 2009] |
Truck traffic: | 5% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Superior to present desirable criteria [9] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
Pier/abutment protection: | In place and functioning [2] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 44.1 |
Recommended work: | Widening of existing bridge or other major structure without deck rehabilitation or replacement [33] |
Estimated cost of work: | $2,153,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
February 2018 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 19251 | 44.1 |
February 2016 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 19251 | 55.9 |
March 2014 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 19251 | 57.8 |
February 2012 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Satisfactory | 19251 | 58.6 |
February 2010 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 19251 | 44.6 |
February 2008 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 10164 | 64.4 |
February 2006 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 2599 | 66.1 |
December 2004 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 2599 | 54.9 |
October 2003 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 2599 | 53.8 |
September 2002 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 2599 | 65.1 |
May 2001 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 2599 | 53.8 |
February 2001 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 2599 | 53.8 |
May 1999 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 2599 | 53.8 |
May 1997 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 2599 | 53.8 |
May 1995 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 2599 | 62.8 |
June 1993 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 2599 | 66.9 |
May 1991 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 20775 | 54.2 |