THREE BRIDGES ROAD over BURNT MILL BRANCH
Map
Coordinates:
+38.39668, -75.3418138°23'48" N, 75°20'31" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | THREE BRIDGES ROAD over BURNT MILL BRANCH |
Structure number: | 200000WI1231010 |
Location: | 0.5 MI E OF MD RTE 94 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 17.1 ft. [5.2 m] |
Total length: | 68.9 ft. [21.0 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 29.2 ft. [8.9 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 32.2 ft. [9.8 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1967 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 18 / H 20 [4] |
Number of main spans: | 4 |
Main spans material: | Wood or timber [7] |
Main spans design: | Slab [01] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: November 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 849 [as of 2017] |
Truck traffic: | 5% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 66.8 |
Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
November 2018 | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Poor | 849 | 66.8 |
November 2017 | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Poor | 849 | 66.8 |
November 2016 | Poor | Good | Good | Poor | 824 | 66.8 |
November 2015 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 824 | 82.9 |
December 2014 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 824 | 82.9 |
December 2013 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 800 | 82.9 |
December 2012 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 800 | 80.9 |
December 2011 | Poor | Good | Good | Poor | 750 | 59.8 |
October 2010 | Poor | Good | Good | Poor | 750 | 59.8 |
October 2008 | Poor | Good | Good | Poor | 750 | 69.8 |
October 2006 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 750 | 85.9 |
October 2004 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 750 | 85.9 |
February 2003 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 750 | 96.9 |
December 2000 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 750 | 96.9 |
December 1998 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 750 | 96.9 |
December 1996 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Good | 750 | 96.9 |
January 1996 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Good | 750 | 98.9 |
November 1994 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 750 | 98.9 |
November 1993 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 750 | 98.9 |
November 1991 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 750 | 58.1 |