M-89 (WASHINGTON) over GTW RR & KALAMAZOO RIVER

Map

Coordinates:
+42.32030, -85.19281
42°19'13" N, 85°11'34" W

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.

Name:	M-89 (WASHINGTON) over GTW RR & KALAMAZOO RIVER
Structure number:	000000000001192
Old structure number:	13113012000R010 `(from 1992 edition)`
Location:	0.1 MI N OF I-94 BL
Purpose:	Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over railroad and waterway
Route classification:	Other Principal Arterial (Urban) `[14]`
Length of largest span:	124.0 ft. `[37.8 m]`
Total length:	713.0 ft. `[217.3 m]`
Roadway width between curbs:	51.8 ft. `[15.8 m]`
Deck width edge-to-edge:	66.3 ft. `[20.2 m]`
Vertical clearance below bridge:	23.0 ft. `[7.0 m]`
Owner:	State Highway Agency `[01]`
Year built:	1982
Historic significance:	Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places `[5]`
Design load:	MS 18 / HS 20 `[5]`
Number of main spans:	8
Main spans material:	Steel continuous `[4]`
Main spans design:	Stringer/Multi-beam or girder `[02]`
Deck type:	Concrete Cast-in-Place `[1]`
Wearing surface:	Latex Concrete or similar additive `[3]`

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:	Fair
Status:	Open, no restriction `[A]`
Average daily traffic:	11,004 `[as of 2007]`
Truck traffic:	2% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Satisfactory `[6 out of 9]`
Superstructure condition:	Satisfactory `[6 out of 9]`
Substructure condition:	Fair `[5 out of 9]`
Structural appraisal:	Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is `[5]`
Deck geometry appraisal:	Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is `[4]`
Underclearances appraisal:	Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is `[5]`
Water adequacy appraisal:	Superior to present desirable criteria `[9]`
Roadway alignment appraisal:	Equal to present desirable criteria `[8]`
Channel protection:	Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. `[8]`
Scour condition:	Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. `[8]`
Sufficiency rating:	68.7

Date	Condition	Deck	Superstructure	Substructure	ADT	Suff. Rating
July 2017	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Fair	11004	68.7
July 2015	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Fair	11004	68.7
July 2013	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Fair	11004	68.7
July 2011	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	11004	80.0
July 2009	Fair	Satisfactory	Good	Satisfactory	11004	81.1
July 2007	Fair	Satisfactory	Good	Satisfactory	16762	80.1
July 2005	Fair	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	5000	81.1
July 2003	Fair	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	5000	81.4
July 2001	Fair	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	5000	81.4
December 1999	Fair	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	5000	84.2
September 1997	Fair	Fair	Good	Good	5000	80.4
June 1995	Fair	Satisfactory	Good	Good	4000	81.6
June 1993	Fair	Satisfactory	Good	Good	4000	81.6
April 1992	Fair	Satisfactory	Very Good	Good	4000	81.6

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.

Element	Units	Quantity	1-Good	2-Fair	3-Poor	4-Serious
Superstructure
Steel Girder/Beam	linear ft.	3,886	3,751	135	0	0
Steel Protective Coating	sq. ft.	53,018	0	52,982	6	30
Deck
Reinforced Concrete Deck	sq. ft.	47,358	45,558	640	1,160	0
Substructure
Reinforced Concrete Column	each	14	13	1	0	0
Reinforced Concrete Pier Wall	linear ft.	45	45	0	0	0
Reinforced Concrete Abutment	linear ft.	198	196	2	0	0
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap	linear ft.	511	439	31	41	0
Joints
Strip Seal Joint	linear ft.	200	0	175	24	1
Bearings
Movable Bearing	each	54	0	54	0	0
Steel Protective Coating	sq. ft.	216	0	210	6	0
Fixed Bearing	each	36	0	36	0	0
Steel Protective Coating	sq. ft.	126	0	122	4	0
Bridge Rail
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail	linear ft.	1,426	1,304	104	18	0