OLD-27 over TEK CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+42.08568, -84.9873742°05'08" N, 84°59'15" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | OLD-27 over TEK CREEK |
Structure number: | 000000000001325 |
Old structure number: | 13200088000B010 (from 1992 edition) |
Location: | TEKSHONA TWP SEC 34 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
Length of largest span: | 30.8 ft. [9.4 m] |
Total length: | 30.8 ft. [9.4 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 35.1 ft. [10.7 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 38.1 ft. [11.6 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1930 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Main span material: | Concrete [1] |
Main span design: | Tee beam [04] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: September 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 2,524 [as of 1995] |
Truck traffic: | 14% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Scour condition: | Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U] |
Sufficiency rating: | 66.3 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
September 2017 | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | Satisfactory | 2524 | 66.3 |
September 2015 | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | Satisfactory | 2524 | 62.1 |
September 2013 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 2524 | 90.7 |
September 2011 | Fair | Good | Fair | Fair | 2524 | 79.2 |
September 2009 | Fair | Good | Fair | Fair | 2524 | 79.2 |
October 2007 | Fair | Good | Fair | Fair | 2524 | 79.2 |
September 2005 | Fair | Good | Fair | Fair | 2524 | 80.4 |
September 2003 | Fair | Good | Fair | Fair | 2524 | 80.4 |
November 2001 | Fair | Good | Fair | Fair | 2524 | 80.4 |
November 1999 | Poor | Very Good | Poor | Poor | 2524 | 62.8 |
December 1997 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Good | 2524 | 91.3 |
December 1995 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 2524 | 91.3 |
January 1994 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 2524 | 96.3 |
December 1991 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 2499 | 98.1 |
November 1989 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 4133 | 97.4 |