M-28 over MCLEOD DITCH
Map
Coordinates:
+46.30367, -85.2299646°18'13" N, 85°13'48" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | M-28 over MCLEOD DITCH |
Structure number: | 000000000001598 |
Old structure number: | 17117061000B010 (from 1992 edition) |
Location: | 0.4 MI E OF LUCE CO LINE |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Principal Arterial - Other (Rural) [02] |
Length of largest span: | 27.9 ft. [8.5 m] |
Total length: | 27.9 ft. [8.5 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 35.1 ft. [10.7 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 37.4 ft. [11.4 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1936 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
Main span material: | Concrete [1] |
Main span design: | Tee beam [04] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: May 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 2,127 [as of 2007] |
Truck traffic: | 18% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Scour condition: | Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U] |
Sufficiency rating: | 65.5 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
May 2018 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 2127 | 65.5 |
May 2016 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 2127 | 65.5 |
May 2014 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 2127 | 65.5 |
May 2012 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 2127 | 65.8 |
May 2010 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 2127 | 65.8 |
May 2008 | Poor | Good | Good | Poor | 2127 | 49.8 |
May 2006 | Poor | Good | Good | Poor | 2618 | 49.8 |
May 2004 | Poor | Good | Good | Poor | 2230 | 49.8 |
May 2002 | Poor | Good | Good | Poor | 2200 | 49.8 |
June 2000 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 2200 | 77.5 |
October 1998 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 2200 | 83.4 |
August 1996 | Fair | Very Good | Good | Satisfactory | 2200 | 76.8 |
September 1994 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 2400 | 76.9 |
September 1992 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Satisfactory | 2400 | 76.9 |
November 1990 | Fair | Satisfactory | Very Good | Satisfactory | 2400 | 76.9 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Reinforced Concrete Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 224 | 184 | 40 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 1,055 | 1,043 | 12 | 0 | 0 |
Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 1,055 | 1,055 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 100 | 0 | 75 | 25 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 56 | 0 | 56 | 0 | 0 |