Share:

TUORI RD over SOUTH BR OF WAISKA RIVER

Chippewa County, Michigan

Map

Coordinates:
+46.36991, -84.46810
46°22'12" N, 84°28'05" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.

Name:	TUORI RD over SOUTH BR OF WAISKA RIVER
Structure number:	000000000001623
Old structure number:	17200029000B010 `(from 1992 edition)`
Location:	2 MI E. OF DAFTER
Purpose:	Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:	Local (Rural) `[09]`
Length of largest span:	49.9 ft. `[15.2 m]`
Total length:	53.8 ft. `[16.4 m]`
Roadway width between curbs:	27.9 ft. `[8.5 m]`
Deck width edge-to-edge:	29.9 ft. `[9.1 m]`
Owner:	County Highway Agency `[02]`
Year built:	1993
Historic significance:	Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places `[5]`
Design load:	MS 18 / HS 20 `[5]`
Main span material:	Prestressed concrete `[5]`
Main span design:	Box beam or girders - Multiple `[05]`
Deck type:	Concrete Cast-in-Place `[1]`
Wearing surface:	Bituminous `[6]`

Latest Available Inspection: June 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:	Good
Status:	Open, no restriction `[A]`
Average daily traffic:	100
Deck condition:	Good `[7 out of 9]`
Superstructure condition:	Good `[7 out of 9]`
Substructure condition:	Good `[7 out of 9]`
Structural appraisal:	Better than present minimum criteria `[7]`
Deck geometry appraisal:	Better than present minimum criteria `[7]`
Water adequacy appraisal:	Better than present minimum criteria `[7]`
Roadway alignment appraisal:	Equal to present desirable criteria `[8]`
Channel protection:	Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. `[8]`
Scour condition:	Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. `[8]`
Sufficiency rating:	100.0

Previous Inspections

Date	Condition	Deck	Superstructure	Substructure	ADT	Suff. Rating
June 2017	Good	Good	Good	Good	100	100.0
June 2015	Good	Good	Good	Good	100	100.0
June 2013	Good	Good	Good	Good	100	100.0
June 2011	Good	Very Good	Very Good	Good	100	100.0
June 2009	Good	Very Good	Very Good	Good	100	100.0
May 2007	Good	Very Good	Very Good	Good	100	100.0
June 2005	Good	Very Good	Very Good	Very Good	100	100.0
June 2003	Good	Very Good	Very Good	Very Good	100	100.0
June 2001	Good	Very Good	Very Good	Very Good	100	100.0
June 1999	Good	Very Good	Very Good	Very Good	100	100.0
June 1997	Good	Very Good	Very Good	Very Good	100	100.0
June 1995	Good	Very Good	Very Good	Very Good	100	97.0
June 1993	Good	Very Good	Very Good	Very Good	100	40.9
June 1991	Poor	Serious	Serious	Poor	100	18.9

© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1248759