Share:

EAST-WEST ROAD over ROXBURY CREEK

Map

Coordinates:
+46.46967, -85.02897
46°28'11" N, 85°01'44" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:EAST-WEST ROAD over ROXBURY CREEK
Structure number:000000000001670
Old structure number:17316I00001B010 (from 1992 edition)
Location:12 MI N OF ECKERMAN
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:24.0 ft. [7.3 m]
Total length:24.9 ft. [7.6 m]
Roadway width between curbs:20.0 ft. [6.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:20.7 ft. [6.3 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1947
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 13.5 / H 15 [2]
Main span material:Wood or timber [7]
Main span design:Other [00]
Deck type:Wood or Timber [8]
Wearing surface:Gravel [8]

Latest Available Inspection: June 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:30
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:67.3
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$80,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
June 2017FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory3067.3
June 2015FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory3067.3
June 2013FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory3067.3
June 2011FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory3067.3
June 2009FairGoodGoodSatisfactory3067.3
May 2007FairGoodGoodSatisfactory3067.3
June 2005FairGoodGoodSatisfactory3067.3
June 2003FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory3066.3
June 2001FairVery GoodGoodSatisfactory3065.3
June 1999FairVery GoodGoodSatisfactory3070.3
June 1997GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good3065.3
June 1995GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good3080.8
June 1993GoodVery GoodVery GoodGood3080.8
June 1991GoodVery GoodVery GoodGood3080.8