ROSEBUSH ROAD over NORTH BR SALT RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+43.69883, -84.6582443°41'56" N, 84°39'30" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | ROSEBUSH ROAD over NORTH BR SALT RIVER |
Structure number: | 000000000004287 |
Old structure number: | 37200022000B150 (from 1992 edition) |
Location: | 0.5M E NWCOR SEC15 DENV |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
Length of largest span: | 83.7 ft. [25.5 m] |
Total length: | 85.0 ft. [25.9 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 32.2 ft. [9.8 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 34.8 ft. [10.6 m] |
Skew angle: | 15° |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 2017 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Number of main spans: | 21 |
Main spans material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
Main spans design: | Box Beam or girders - Single or Spread [06] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: December 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 885 [as of 2016] |
Truck traffic: | 5% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 99.5 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
December 2017 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 885 | 99.5 |
April 2016 | Poor | Poor | Serious | Fair | 1740 | 33.5 |
April 2015 | Poor | Poor | Serious | Fair | 798 | 39.3 |
May 2013 | Poor | Poor | Serious | Fair | 638 | 45.4 |
May 2012 | Poor | Poor | Serious | Fair | 638 | 45.4 |
May 2011 | Poor | Poor | Serious | Fair | 638 | 45.4 |
May 2009 | Poor | Poor | Serious | Fair | 638 | 46.1 |
June 2008 | Poor | Fair | Serious | Satisfactory | 800 | 48.0 |
July 2006 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Satisfactory | 800 | 67.5 |
June 2004 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 800 | 85.9 |
July 2002 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 800 | 88.9 |
July 2000 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 788 | 96.9 |
July 1998 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 788 | 96.9 |
July 1996 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 425 | 90.7 |
July 1994 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Good | 425 | 93.5 |
June 1992 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Very Good | 425 | 93.5 |
March 1990 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 425 | 93.5 |