ANTCLIFF ROAD over STONER CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+42.75375, -83.9943442°45'13" N, 83°59'40" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | ANTCLIFF ROAD over STONER CREEK |
Structure number: | 000000000005835 |
Old structure number: | 47200040000B010 (from 1992 edition) |
Location: | SEC 9 COHOCTAH TWP |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
Length of largest span: | 18.0 ft. [5.5 m] |
Total length: | 20.7 ft. [6.3 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 20.0 ft. [6.1 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 22.3 ft. [6.8 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1922 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6] |
Main span material: | Concrete [1] |
Main span design: | Slab [01] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: August 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 600 [as of 2015] |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Scour condition: | Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U] |
Sufficiency rating: | 54.0 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
August 2018 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 600 | 54.0 |
August 2016 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 600 | 54.0 |
August 2014 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 504 | 64.1 |
August 2012 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 500 | 65.1 |
June 2010 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 520 | 64.1 |
April 2008 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 770 | 64.0 |
April 2006 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 727 | 52.9 |
October 2003 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Fair | 727 | 50.9 |
October 1999 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Fair | 569 | 51.0 |
June 1998 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Fair | 569 | 51.0 |
June 1996 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Fair | 569 | 51.0 |
September 1994 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Fair | 256 | 40.1 |
June 1993 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Fair | 256 | 40.1 |
May 1991 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Satisfactory | 256 | 40.1 |