Share:

SARGENT ROAD over RED CEDAR RIVER IMP. DRN

Livingston County, Michigan

Map

Coordinates:
+42.61386, -84.08080
42°36'50" N, 84°04'51" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.

Name:	SARGENT ROAD over RED CEDAR RIVER IMP. DRN
Structure number:	000000000005866
Old structure number:	47308H00001B010 `(from 1992 edition)`
Location:	SEC 27-34 HANDY TWP
Purpose:	Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:	Local (Rural) `[09]`
Length of largest span:	34.8 ft. `[10.6 m]`
Total length:	34.8 ft. `[10.6 m]`
Roadway width between curbs:	29.9 ft. `[9.1 m]`
Deck width edge-to-edge:	31.8 ft. `[9.7 m]`
Owner:	County Highway Agency `[02]`
Year built:	1997
Historic significance:	Bridge is possibly eligible for the National Register of Historic Places `[3]`
Design load:	MS 18 / HS 20 `[5]`
Main span material:	Wood or timber `[7]`
Main span design:	Slab `[01]`
Deck type:	Wood or Timber `[8]`
Wearing surface:	Bituminous `[6]`

Latest Available Inspection: August 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:	Good
Status:	Open, no restriction `[A]`
Average daily traffic:	220 `[as of 2013]`
Deck condition:	Good `[7 out of 9]`
Superstructure condition:	Good `[7 out of 9]`
Substructure condition:	Good `[7 out of 9]`
Structural appraisal:	Better than present minimum criteria `[7]`
Deck geometry appraisal:	Equal to present minimum criteria `[6]`
Water adequacy appraisal:	Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is `[5]`
Roadway alignment appraisal:	Equal to present minimum criteria `[6]`
Channel protection:	Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. `[7]`
Scour condition:	Bridge is scour critical; bridge foundations determined to be unstable. `[3]`
Sufficiency rating:	95.9

Previous Inspections

Date	Condition	Deck	Superstructure	Substructure	ADT	Suff. Rating
August 2017	Good	Good	Good	Good	220	95.9
August 2015	Good	Good	Good	Good	220	95.9
August 2013	Good	Good	Good	Good	220	95.9
August 2011	Good	Good	Good	Good	230	95.9
July 2009	Good	Good	Good	Good	230	95.9
September 2007	Good	Good	Good	Very Good	201	96.0
August 2005	Good	Very Good	Very Good	Excellent	201	95.9
September 2003	Good	Very Good	Very Good	Excellent	201	95.9
July 1999	Good	Excellent	Excellent	Excellent	100	96.0
August 1997	Poor	Poor	Serious	Poor	100	48.9
July 1996	Poor	Poor	Serious	Poor	200	16.4
October 1994	Poor	Poor	Serious	Poor	200	16.3
July 1993	Poor	Poor	Serious	Poor	88	20.1
May 1991	Poor	Poor	Serious	Fair	88	20.1

© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1252670