Share:

LAYTON ROAD over E BR RED CEDAR RIVER DRN

Livingston County, Michigan

Map

Coordinates:
+42.63581, -84.03263
42°38'09" N, 84°01'57" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.

Name:	LAYTON ROAD over E BR RED CEDAR RIVER DRN
Structure number:	000000000005877
Old structure number:	47310H00015B010 `(from 1992 edition)`
Location:	SEC 19 HOWELL TWP
Purpose:	Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:	Local (Rural) `[09]`
Length of largest span:	36.7 ft. `[11.2 m]`
Total length:	38.1 ft. `[11.6 m]`
Roadway width between curbs:	28.5 ft. `[8.7 m]`
Deck width edge-to-edge:	32.2 ft. `[9.8 m]`
Owner:	County Highway Agency `[02]`
Year built:	2013
Historic significance:	Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places `[5]`
Main span material:	Prestressed concrete `[5]`
Main span design:	Box beam or girders - Multiple `[05]`
Deck type:	Concrete Cast-in-Place `[1]`
Wearing surface:	Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) `[1]`

Latest Available Inspection: August 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:	Good
Status:	Open, no restriction `[A]`
Average daily traffic:	223 `[as of 2012]`
Deck condition:	Very Good `[8 out of 9]`
Superstructure condition:	Very Good `[8 out of 9]`
Substructure condition:	Excellent `[9 out of 9]`
Structural appraisal:	Equal to present desirable criteria `[8]`
Deck geometry appraisal:	Equal to present minimum criteria `[6]`
Water adequacy appraisal:	Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is `[5]`
Roadway alignment appraisal:	Equal to present minimum criteria `[6]`
Channel protection:	Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. `[8]`
Scour condition:	Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. `[8]`
Sufficiency rating:	98.8

Previous Inspections

Date	Condition	Deck	Superstructure	Substructure	ADT	Suff. Rating
August 2017	Good	Very Good	Very Good	Excellent	223	98.8
August 2015	Good	Very Good	Very Good	Excellent	223	98.8
August 2013	Good	Excellent	Excellent	Excellent	223	98.8
June 2011	Poor	Satisfactory	-	Poor	223	18.3
May 2009	Poor	Satisfactory	-	Poor	223	18.3
May 2007	Fair	Good	-	Fair	223	19.5
August 2005	Poor	Good	Poor	Fair	133	20.0
September 2003	Poor	Good	Poor	Satisfactory	133	20.0
October 1999	Poor	Good	Poor	Satisfactory	534	17.1
August 1998	Poor	Good	Poor	Satisfactory	534	17.1
July 1996	Poor	Good	Poor	Satisfactory	257	19.1
October 1994	Poor	Good	Poor	Satisfactory	257	19.1
July 1993	Poor	Good	Poor	Satisfactory	257	17.7
August 1991	Poor	Good	Poor	Satisfactory	257	17.7

© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1252681