MUNSELL ROAD over RED CEDAR RIVER IMP DRN
Map
Coordinates:
+42.56106, -84.0518142°33'40" N, 84°03'07" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | MUNSELL ROAD over RED CEDAR RIVER IMP DRN |
Structure number: | 000000000005880 |
Old structure number: | 47311H00004B010 (from 1992 edition) |
Location: | SEC 14 IOSCO TWP |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 23.0 ft. [7.0 m] |
Total length: | 24.0 ft. [7.3 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 23.0 ft. [7.0 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 24.0 ft. [7.3 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1937 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6] |
Main span material: | Steel [3] |
Main span design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: June 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 160 [as of 2012] |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Scour condition: | Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U] |
Sufficiency rating: | 57.3 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
June 2018 | Poor | Satisfactory | Good | Poor | 160 | 57.3 |
June 2016 | Poor | Satisfactory | Good | Poor | 160 | 57.3 |
June 2014 | Poor | Satisfactory | Good | Poor | 160 | 57.3 |
June 2012 | Poor | Satisfactory | Good | Poor | 160 | 57.3 |
June 2010 | Poor | Satisfactory | Good | Poor | 209 | 49.1 |
October 2008 | Poor | Satisfactory | Good | Poor | 209 | 49.0 |
August 2006 | Poor | Satisfactory | Good | Poor | 292 | 44.4 |
July 2004 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 292 | 67.6 |
July 2002 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 292 | 67.6 |
February 2000 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 95 | 80.7 |
September 1997 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 95 | 80.7 |
September 1995 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 95 | 95.4 |
October 1993 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 95 | 95.4 |
June 1991 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 95 | 95.4 |