COUNTY ROAD 442 over TAHQUAMENON RIVER

Map

Coordinates:
+46.37274, -85.78182
46°22'22" N, 85°46'55" W

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.

Name:	COUNTY ROAD 442 over TAHQUAMENON RIVER
Structure number:	000000000005925
Old structure number:	48200442000B010 `(from 1992 edition)`
Location:	2 MI N OF DANAHER
Purpose:	Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:	Local (Rural) `[09]`
Length of largest span:	35.8 ft. `[10.9 m]`
Total length:	37.1 ft. `[11.3 m]`
Roadway width between curbs:	15.1 ft. `[4.6 m]`
Deck width edge-to-edge:	15.4 ft. `[4.7 m]`
Owner:	County Highway Agency `[02]`
Year built:	2009
Historic significance:	Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places `[5]`
Design load:	MS 18 / HS 20 `[5]`
Main span material:	Prestressed concrete `[5]`
Main span design:	Box beam or girders - Multiple `[05]`
Deck type:	Concrete Cast-in-Place `[1]`
Wearing surface:	Bituminous `[6]`

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:	Good
Status:	Open, no restriction `[A]`
Average daily traffic:	20 `[as of 2016]`
Truck traffic:	3% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Very Good `[8 out of 9]`
Superstructure condition:	Very Good `[8 out of 9]`
Substructure condition:	Very Good `[8 out of 9]`
Structural appraisal:	Equal to present desirable criteria `[8]`
Deck geometry appraisal:	Better than present minimum criteria `[7]`
Water adequacy appraisal:	Equal to present desirable criteria `[8]`
Roadway alignment appraisal:	Equal to present desirable criteria `[8]`
Channel protection:	Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. `[7]`
Scour condition:	Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. `[8]`
Sufficiency rating:	88.7

Date	Condition	Deck	Superstructure	Substructure	ADT	Suff. Rating
October 2018	Good	Very Good	Very Good	Very Good	20	88.7
October 2016	Good	Very Good	Very Good	Very Good	20	88.7
October 2014	Good	Very Good	Very Good	Very Good	20	88.7
October 2012	Good	Very Good	Very Good	Very Good	50	88.7
October 2010	Good	Excellent	Excellent	Excellent	50	88.7
December 2009	Good	Excellent	Excellent	Excellent	50	88.7
November 2008	Poor	Very Good	Good	Critical	50	23.3
October 2007	Poor	Very Good	Good	Critical	50	23.3
November 2006	Poor	Very Good	Good	Critical	50	23.3
October 2005	Poor	Very Good	Good	Critical	50	23.4
October 2004	Poor	Very Good	Good	Critical	50	23.4
January 2004	Poor	Very Good	Good	Critical	50	24.7
November 2002	Poor	Very Good	Good	Critical	50	24.7
October 2001	Poor	Very Good	Good	Critical	50	24.7
September 2000	Poor	Very Good	Good	Critical	50	24.7
November 1999	Poor	Very Good	Good	Critical	50	24.7
December 1998	Poor	Very Good	Good	Serious	50	24.7
December 1997	Poor	Very Good	Good	Serious	50	24.7
August 1996	Poor	Very Good	Good	Serious	50	24.7
September 1994	Poor	Very Good	Fair	Serious	50	25.3
July 1992	Poor	Excellent	Poor	Serious	50	29.1
January 1990	Poor	Serious	Poor	Serious	50	23.9