CROSWELL AVE over BIG S BR PERE MARQUETTE

Map

Coordinates:
+43.67699, -85.90090
43°40'37" N, 85°54'03" W

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.

Name:	CROSWELL AVE over BIG S BR PERE MARQUETTE
Structure number:	000000000007777
Old structure number:	62318H00016B010 `(from 1992 edition)`
Location:	7.0 MI SW OF BITELY
Purpose:	Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:	Local (Rural) `[09]`
Length of largest span:	14.8 ft. `[4.5 m]`
Total length:	46.9 ft. `[14.3 m]`
Roadway width between curbs:	16.1 ft. `[4.9 m]`
Deck width edge-to-edge:	17.4 ft. `[5.3 m]`
Owner:	County Highway Agency `[02]`
Year built:	1952
Year reconstructed:	2004
Historic significance:	Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places `[5]`
Design load:	MS 18 / HS 20 `[5]`
Number of main spans:	3
Main spans material:	Wood or timber `[7]`
Main spans design:	Stringer/Multi-beam or girder `[02]`
Deck type:	Wood or Timber `[8]`
Wearing surface:	Wood or Timber `[7]`

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:	Fair
Status:	Open, no restriction `[A]`
Average daily traffic:	100 `[as of 2000]`
Deck condition:	Good `[7 out of 9]`
Superstructure condition:	Satisfactory `[6 out of 9]`
Substructure condition:	Fair `[5 out of 9]`
Structural appraisal:	Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is `[5]`
Deck geometry appraisal:	Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action `[3]`
Water adequacy appraisal:	Equal to present minimum criteria `[6]`
Roadway alignment appraisal:	Equal to present minimum criteria `[6]`
Channel protection:	Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. `[6]`
Scour condition:	Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. `[5]`
Sufficiency rating:	58.8
Recommended work:	Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. `[31]`
Estimated cost of work:	$140,000

Date	Condition	Deck	Superstructure	Substructure	ADT	Suff. Rating
June 2018	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Fair	100	58.8
June 2016	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Fair	100	58.8
June 2014	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Fair	100	58.8
June 2012	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Fair	100	72.4
May 2010	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Fair	100	72.4
May 2008	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Fair	100	69.4
May 2006	Fair	Very Good	Good	Fair	100	69.4
January 2005	Fair	Excellent	Good	Fair	100	69.4
May 2002	Fair	Satisfactory	Good	Satisfactory	100	72.4
April 2000	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	100	78.4
November 1998	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	30	78.5
October 1996	Fair	Satisfactory	-	Satisfactory	30	78.5
October 1994	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	30	65.0
August 1992	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	30	65.0
February 1990	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	30	65.0