Share:

80 TH STREET over BUTLER CREEK

Newaygo County, Michigan

Map

Coordinates:
+43.40928, -85.93834
43°24'33" N, 85°56'18" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.

Name:	80 TH STREET over BUTLER CREEK
Structure number:	000000000007781
Old structure number:	62321H00010B020 `(from 1992 edition)`
Location:	4.0 MI S OF FREMONT
Purpose:	Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:	Local (Rural) `[09]`
Length of largest span:	27.9 ft. `[8.5 m]`
Total length:	29.9 ft. `[9.1 m]`
Roadway width between curbs:	27.9 ft. `[8.5 m]`
Deck width edge-to-edge:	31.2 ft. `[9.5 m]`
Skew angle:	27°
Owner:	County Highway Agency `[02]`
Year built:	2006
Historic significance:	Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places `[5]`
Design load:	MS 18 / HS 20 `[5]`
Main span material:	Concrete `[1]`
Main span design:	Culvert `[19]`
Deck type:	Other `[9]`
Wearing surface:	Bituminous `[6]`

Latest Available Inspection: June 2018

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:	Good
Status:	Open, no restriction `[A]`
Average daily traffic:	199 `[as of 2006]`
Truck traffic:	3% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:	Equal to present desirable criteria `[8]`
Deck geometry appraisal:	Equal to present minimum criteria `[6]`
Water adequacy appraisal:	Better than present minimum criteria `[7]`
Roadway alignment appraisal:	Better than present minimum criteria `[7]`
Channel protection:	Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. `[6]`
Culvert condition:	No noticeable or noteworthy deficiencies which affect the condition of the culvert. Insignificant scrape marks caused by drift. `[8]`
Scour condition:	Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. `[5]`
Sufficiency rating:	100.0

Previous Inspections

Date	Condition	Culvert Condition	ADT	Suff. Rating
June 2018	Good	8 out of 10	199	100.0
June 2016	Good	8 out of 10	199	100.0
June 2014	Good	8 out of 10	199	100.0
June 2012	Good	8 out of 10	199	100.0
May 2010	Good	8 out of 10	199	100.0
May 2008	Good	8 out of 10	199	100.0
April 2006	Poor	N out of 10	199	35.8
April 2004	Poor	N out of 10	300	14.0
May 2002	Poor	N out of 10	300	17.5
April 2000	Poor	N out of 10	100	41.0
December 1998	Poor	N out of 10	50	46.1
September 1996	Poor	4 out of 10	50	80.6
May 1996	Poor	N out of 10	50	50.1
August 1994	Poor	N out of 10	50	43.0
May 1992	Poor	N out of 10	50	43.0
February 1990	Poor	N out of 10	50	49.8

© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1254401